Legal Opinion

Hooker v. Hoskyns

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 3, 1964No. 39993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Justice.

The case of Hooker v. Hoskyns, Okl., 328 P.2d 404, was an appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Tulsa County, upon trial de novo, affirming a judgment of the County Court of that county, awarding fees to the special administrators of the estate of Flora B. Barton, deceased, as well as fees to the attorneys for such special administrators, and refusing to surcharge the special administrators with the interest allowed to accrue by the failure to pay federal and state estate taxes when due. Our opinion in such case affirmed that part of the trial court’s judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hansen v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. Russell v. MargoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Hooker v. HoskynsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  4. In Re Cook's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  5. Potts v. Biggs & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Estate of ShattuckCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API