Legal Opinion

Clark v. Harpers Ferry Timber Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1912PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pocahontas County. Bill in equity by Harry E. Clark and other against the Har-pers Ferry Timber Company and others. Ffom a decree for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

POEEENBARGER, JUDGE:

The relation of the appellants, W. C. Bond and N. H. Bond, to the land and debt involved in this suit will appear from the facts stated in Bond v. Taylor, 68 W. Va. 317. The Pocahontas Tanning Company assigned the unpaid purchase money notes, mentioned in the statement of that case, to Harry.E. Clark and John W. McCullough, partners, under the firm name of Clark & McCullough, and they brought this suit, while that *314of Bond v. Taylor was pending, to enforce the vendors lien reserved to secure the payment of the notes, making their assign- or, the Pocahontas Tanning Company,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kanawha Valley Bank v. WilsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Huxley v. RiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Whitten v. SaundersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1881
  4. Bond v. TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. McCleary v. GranthamWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Morris v. BairdWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Gebhart v. ShraderWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Batten v. Hope Natural Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Conaway v. OverholtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API