Legal Opinion

Fab’rik Boutique, Inc. v. Shops Around Lenox, Inc

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 10, 2014No. A14A0937PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFadden, Judge.

Fab’rik Boutique, Inc. (“Fab’rik”) sought a declaratory judgment that a restrictive covenant in its lease with its landlord, Shops Around Lenox, Inc. (“Shops”), is unenforceable because it is overly broad. Both parties moved for summary judgment, and the trial court denied Fab’rik’s motion and granted summary judgment to Shops. We find the restrictive covenant ambiguous, but that ambiguity can be resolved by application of the general rules of contract construction. So construed, the restrictive covenant is not overly broad. Accordingly, we affirm.

1. Facts.

To prevail on a…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. W. R. Grace & Co. v. MouyalSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  2. City of Baldwin v. Woodard & Curran, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  3. Watson v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  4. Holton v. Physician Oncology ServicesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  5. Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wright v. IC Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Joseph Jerry Wright v. Ic Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API