Schweinefuss v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Commissioner.
Clement J. Schweinefuss, Robert Worth-ington, and Janie Worthington were jointly indicted, jointly tried, and all convicted of the offense of “pandering,” denounced by KRS 436.040, and the offense of “aiding and abetting prostitution”, contrary to the provisions of KRS 436.075(2). The charge under KRS 436.040 is a felony; the latter charge of “aiding and abetting prostitution” is a misdemeanor. In an effort to minimize confusion, we shall refer to the appellants as “defendant Schweinefuss,” “defendant Robert,” and “defendant Janie.”
The jury’s verdict, followed by judgment…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. LefkowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Manning v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
- Bowman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tamme v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
- St. Clair v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- Caine v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
- Jaggers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
- Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.