Legal Opinion

Karron v. Karron

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 24, 1933No. 437PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff claims infringement of patent No. 1,568,739, for a machine for produe*786ing frame parts, issued to him on January 5, 1926. He relies only on claim 4, which is quoted: “4. In a machine of the character described, stationary and movable die members for cutting integrally connected ears in a sheet metal strip, means movable with the movable cutting die for cutting said strip between integral ears previously formed therein to sever a section from said strip having an ear at each end thereof, and means for transversely bending said severed section of the strip…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Butler v. SteckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Anderson & Writer Corp. v. Hanky Beret, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Premier MacHine Co. v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
  2. Cornell v. Chase Brass & Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Hookless Fastener Co. v. G. E. Prentice Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. National Machinery Co. v. Waterbury Farrel Foundry & Machine Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API