Legal Opinion

Scavenius v. Manchester Port District

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 19, 1970No. 198-2PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, C. J.

In this action plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief, claiming that defendants have encroached upon their tidelands and created a nuisance by the construction of a public ramp and dock on adjacent property in Kitsap County. Plaintiffs demanded a jury trial and the case was set as such. Certain defendants moved to strike the jury or in the alternative, for a change of venue to another county. On February 10, 1970, the trial court entered an “Order Granting Motion to Strike Jury and Denying Motion for Change of Venue”.

Plaintiffs seek a review by certiorari of the order striking the jury…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. StrasburgWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Mullen v. DohertyWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Watkins v. Siler Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Garey v. City of PascoWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Ranta v. GermanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Brown v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Allard v. Pacific National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Story v. Shelter Bay CompanyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  4. Auburn Mechanical, Inc. v. Lydig Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  5. Stieneke v. RussiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API