Legal Opinion
Pugh v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 10, 1997No. Civil Action No. 96-104MMSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Joan Pugh (“Pugh”) filed suit against two of her former employers, Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (“Metlife”) and the Metrahealth Co., Inc. (“Metrahealth”), alleging violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. and state law in connection with her severance pay. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 29 U.S.C. § 1132. Both Metlife and Metra*180health have filed motions for summary judgment. For the reasons that follow, their motions will be granted.
II.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tilton v. Radiation Oncologists, P.A.District Court, D. Delaware · 2006