Legal Opinion

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Piel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Two of the executors appeal from so much of a decree settling their accounts as sustains the sole objection interposed to the account, relating to the purported separation of the nature and functions of the executors and trustees, and adjudges that the account be judicially settled as an intermediate account, that the fiduciaries shall act only in the single capacity of executors and not in separate and successive capacities both as executors and trustees, that the accountants are entitled to be paid only such commissions as are allowed upon an intermediate accounting, and are not entitled to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Laytin v. . DavidsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. In Re the Accounting SlocumNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of ClintonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. In re the Estate of GallaherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of SaphirNew York Surrogate's Court · 1973
  2. In Re Armour's WillSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Chase Manhattan Bank v. SchneiderSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API