Dickson v. Wojcik
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. JONKER, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (docket #24). The Motion is fully briefed. After a thorough review of the record and careful consideration of the applicable law, the Court finds that oral argument is not necessary to resolve the motion. The motion is ready for decision.
*833Background
Plaintiff Dickson brings a series of claims arising out of his service with and separation from Defendant Michigan National Guard (the “Guard”). Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint laying out the factual…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Debbie L. Dowell v. Department of the Interior, Doug Burgum, Secretary of the Interior, et al.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
- Sherrill v. Van CleaveDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Waite v. NE Social Security OfficeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022