Legal Opinion
Subramani v. Bruno Machinery Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered September 7, 2000, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of successor tort liability, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff was injured while using a die cutting press that nonparty T.W. & C.B. Sheridan Company (Old Sheridan) manufactured in 1948 and sold to his employer. In 1964, Old Sheridan sold its manufacturing business, good will, trade name and most of its other assets…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Schumacher v. Richards Shear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Diaz v. South Bend Lathe Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1989
- City of New York v. Charles Pfizer & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Sullivan v. Joy Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by6 opinions
- Van Nocker v. A.W. Chesterton Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Kretzmer v. Firesafe Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Meadows v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- New York v. National Service Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Hayes v. Equality SpecialitiesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.