Legal Opinion

Harding v. Home Investment & Savings Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1930No. Nos. 5379, 5412, 5413Published

1Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING.

GIYENS, C. J.

The petition for rehearing makes four points: First, it is urged that the court went beyond its duties as an appellate court in rejecting the finding of the trial court that the Investment Company was not the agent of the Insurance Company, and, in effect, making a finding of its own that an agency existed. Secondly, it is urged that the court erred in its conclusion that the Investment Company was the agent for the Insurance Company. Thirdly, petitioner contends that the court erred in concluding that the Insurance Company was responsible for the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burlington Savings Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  2. Kraus v. DowellWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Youtsey v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. Burlington Savings Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. Stephens v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API