Burlington Savings Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.
Our conclusion on the question of whether Kuelinle &’ Yoss were the agents of the Prudential Company in the negotiation of the loan by the Prudential Company to the Argotsingers, and our opinion of the eonsequences of such conclusion, are controlling, and we proceed immediately to the discussion of that question. The facts should be considered in the light of some elementary principles.
What one may do himself, he may do by another, and what he.does by another, he does himself. Agency is a representative relationship.
' “The distinguishing features of the agent are his representative character…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sternaman v. . Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Trotter v. Grand Lodge of the Iowa Legion of HonorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- McLean v. FickeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Harrison v. LegoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
- Clement v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1856
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Popejoy v. EastburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Whitney v. KrasneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Andrew v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
- Kann v. FishSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
- Carr v. BenjaminSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.