Legal Opinion

Weme v. Lastavica

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 20, 1990No. C4-90-472PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Chief Justice.

The Special Compensation Fund appeals from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals affirming, by majority decision, a compensation judge's determination that the City of St. Paul was not a general contractor for purposes of imposing liability on the City of St. Paul under Minn.Stat. § 176.215, subd. 1 (1988).1 We affirm.

*405Through its forestry operations, the City of St. Paul was engaged in the trimming of trees and the removal of dead and diseased trees. On land the city leased from the St. Paul Port Authority, the city maintained equipment and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Moorhead v. GrassleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  3. Dille v. Knox Lumber/Division of Southwest ForestSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Klemetsen v. STENBERG CONST. CO., INC.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parson v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  2. Parson v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API