Legal Opinion
United States v. Deasy
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided February 11, 1928No. 991PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
24 F.2d 108 (1928)
UNITED STATES
v.
DEASY et al.
No. 991.
District Court, D. Idaho, N. D.
February 11, 1928.
H. E. Ray, U. S. Dist. Atty., of Boise, Idaho.
Carlton Fox and John L. Fitzgerald, both of Wallace, Idaho, for defendants.
CAVANAH, District Judge.
In this case the United States seeks to enjoin the defendants, during the pendency of this action, from interfering with the Jack Waite Mining Company in carrying out the terms of a certain timber sale contract, by which the company agreed to purchase and pay the sum of $250 to the United States for approximately 500,000 feet of timber, to be cut and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Belk v. MeagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Stanley v. SchwalbySupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Carr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Manuel v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Clipper Mining Co. v. Eli Mining & Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Minnesota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Island Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. MobleyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
- United States v. Pennsylvania Environmental Hearing BoardDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- United States v. ContiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.