Legal Opinion

Schroeder v. Frey

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On rehearing.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The answers admitted the sale and delivery and the amount unpaid upon the price of the goods. But the right of the plaintiffs to recover that price was resisted chiefly on the ground of bankrupt discharges is*72sued to each of the defendants under the authority of the bankrupt laws of the United States. The regularity of the proceedings in whicli these discharges were issued was not impeached. But it was alleged in the reply that the plaintiffs had been induced to part with the goods by reason of false and fraudulent representations made to them prior to the sales and deliveries made; and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palmer v. . HusseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Bradner v. . StrangNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Schroeder v. . FreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hardie v. Swafford Bros. Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1908
  2. Frey v. TorreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Frank v. Michigan Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1910
  4. Strauch v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  5. Golin v. Town of MooersNew York Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API