Bradner v. . Strang
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made December 31, 1880, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon a verdict, and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial. (Eeported below, 23 Hun, 445.) The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtEarl, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover damages which they allege they sustained in consequence of the false and fraudulent representations of the defendants. The defendants in their answer, among other things, denied the alleged fraud and alleged that they had been discharged in bankruptcy. The material facts of the case are as follows:
In the years 1873-4-5 the plaintiffs, under the firm name of Lowery & Bradner, were dealers in. wool and sheepskins at Eochester, and the defendants, under the firm name of Strang & Holland Bros., were commission merchants in the city of Hew York.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Neal v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Morse v. HutchinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Hennequin v. . ClewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
3Cited by11 opinions
- Crawford v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Hardie v. Swafford Bros. Dry Goods Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1908
- Lawrence v. . HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Frey v. TorreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Case v. Sun InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.