Legal Opinion
Hoenig v. Hoenig
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 28, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Tilzer, J.
The defendant husband moves for summary judgment in this action for a separation. The plaintiff wife cross-moves for an order directing the payment of arrears of temporary alimony and for additional counsel fees.
The defendant was and is a resident of New Jersey. The plaintiff was and is a resident of New York. They were married in New York on June 29, 1952 and resided in New York City until 1955. During the time they resided in New York defendant adopted plaintiff’s daughter, issue of a prior marriage, and a son was born of their marriage. In 1955 the parties moved to Trenton, New Jersey and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Estin v. EstinSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Meenan v. MeenanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Hoenig v. HoenigNew York Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by1 opinion
- Degen v. DegenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962