Legal Opinion
Hopson v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 15, 2005No. 04-2152UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARZILAY, Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Eddie Hopson, Jr., appeals from the district court’s August 19, 2004, order granting Defendant-Appel lee DaimlerChrysler Corporation’s (“DaimlerChrysler”) motion for judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Fed. R. Crv. P. 50. Specifically, Hopson contests the court’s dismissal of all but one of his Title VII claims and of all of his claims under Michigan’s Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (ELCRA) in its March 12, 2004, partial grant of summary judgment for the Defendant. He also challenges the trial court’s refusal to admit the evidence presented by…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Miller v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Frick v. Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Burkart v. BurkartOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Beaver v. Siemens Healthineers, AGDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025