Legal Opinion

Williams v. Thurmer

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 6, 2009No. 08-1184PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

In March 1996 a Wisconsin jury found Yusef Williams guilty of first-degree murder, and the judge sentenced him to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole after 45 years. After exhausting his state remedies, Williams filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, arguing, among other things, that his right to due process was violated when a bailiff testified during his trial. The district court denied his petition, but we certified his due-process claim for appeal. We now affirm the judgment of the district court.

At Williams’s trial the State presented two key…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fedell Caffey v. Kim ButlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Etherly v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  3. Raynard Cummings v. Michael MartelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. McDonald v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  5. Ardell v. WiersmaDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API