Legal Opinion
Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 18, 2003No. 02-4098, 02-4162PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCIRICA, Chief Judge.
In this products liability claim under maritime law, a jury rendered a defense verdict. The principal issue on appeal is the proper application of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 to the proffered testimony of plaintiffs’ experts.
I
Because this matter has been twice before our court, see Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., 40 F.3d 622 (3d Cir. 1994); Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A., 216 F.3d 338 (3d Cir.2000), and also before the Supreme Court, see Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A. v. Calhoun, 516 U.S. 199, 116 S.Ct. 619, 133 L.Ed.2d 578 (1996), its…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Antonio Pearson v. Prison Health ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Byron MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Kelvin FordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Calhoun v. Yamaha Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v. Amersham Health, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.