Legal Opinion
Tyler, Jr. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 3, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2014-0601PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Maurice B. Tyler, Jr. brings this action under the Rehabilitation Act against Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”). Before the Court is defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) on the ground that plaintiffs claim is time-barred. (Def.’s Mot. to Dismiss, May 7, 2014 [ECF No. 5].) For the following reasons, the Court will deny defendant’s motion.
BACKGROUND
According to the complaint, in November 2010 plaintiff applied for a job as a security officer…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hardin v. StraubSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gladys Banks v. Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hatter v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Alexander v. WmataDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Abreu v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021