Legal Opinion
Hatter v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 19, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-1470PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Tanya S. Chutkan, Judge
Plaintiff Corwyn Hatter alleges that defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) violated the Rehabilitation Act by requiring him to undergo a medical test not required of other applicants and by failing to hire him. (Am.ComplA 30). Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint as untimely, arguing that it was filed outside the ■ statute of limitations without the benefit of any tolling provisions. For the reasons set forth below, the court DENIES the motion to dismiss.
I. BACKGROUND
Hatter applied for a job with WMATA. On March 24,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Owens-Hart v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Best v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Elliott v. ElliottDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Esters v. Vanguard Clinical, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
- Esters v. Vanguard Clinical, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.