Legal Opinion

Cajo Enterprises, Inc. v. Maxum Indemnity Company (Incorrectly Named as the Hartford Insurance Group)

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided December 19, 2025No. 6:25-cv-00191Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION CAJO ENTERPRISES, INC., § § § Plaintiff, § § v. § Case No. 6:25-cv-191-JDK-JDL § MAXUM INDEMNITY COMPANY § (INCORRECTLY NAMED AS THE § HARTFORD INSURANCE GROUP), § § Defendant. § ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Plaintiff Cajo Enterprises, Inc. filed this insurance coverage dispute against Defendant Maxum Indemnity Company (incorrectly named as “the Hartford Insurance Group”) on May 23, 2025. Docket No. 1. The case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Lormand v. US Unwired, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States Ex Rel. Grubbs v. KannegantiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. Sullivan v. Leor Energy, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. Lone Star Ladies Investment Club v. Schlotzsky's Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API