Legal Opinion
Lone Star Ladies Investment Club v. Schlotzsky's Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 11, 2001No. 99-50958PublishedCited by 184 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
This appeal is from dismissal of a suit on behalf of a class of purchasers of securities, charging that Schlotzsky’s and four of its officers and directors violated the Securities Act of 1933 1 and the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 2 in their required financial filing, including a public offering of securities. The district court, faulting the absence of pleading particulars, dismissed the complaint and refused leave to file an amended complaint deleting all claims under the Securities and Exchange Act. We are persuaded that the proffered amended…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shaw v. Digital Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Pinter v. DahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Melder v. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by184 opinions
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Rosenzweig v. Azurix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Rombach v. ChangCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.