Legal Opinion

Leidy's, Inc. v. H2O Engineering, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 20, 1991No. 90SC515PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

We granted certiorari to review H2O Engineering v. Leidy’s, Inc., 799 P.2d 432 (Colo.App.1990). We now reverse and remand to the court of appeals with directions to reinstate the judgment of the trial court.

The primary issue before us centers on the interpretation of the plain wording of C.R.C.P. 52, which states in pertinent part:

In all actions tried upon the facts without a jury or with an advisory jury, the court shall find the facts specifically and state separately its conclusions of law.... Findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions of motions under Rule 12 or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Behagen v. Amateur Basketball Association Of The United States Of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  2. William Johnson v. Joseph BoticaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  3. Panos Investment Co. v. District Court Ex Rel. County of LarimerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Myers v. American Dental AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  5. McNeece v. McNeeceColorado Court of Appeals · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Archangel Diamond Corp. v. LukoilSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  2. Trump v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Jamison v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Sender v. PowellColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Vento v. Colorado National BankColorado Court of Appeals · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API