Legal Opinion

People v. Speciale

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: By failing to raise the invalidity of the arrest warrant as a ground for suppression of his later statement and of the victim’s identification testimony, defendant has failed to preserve that issue for review (see, People v Fenner, 61 NY2d 971, 973; People v Hall, 61 NY2d 834, 835; People v Cintron, 118 AD2d 650; People v Arnette, 111 AD2d 861, 862, lv denied 65 NY2d 976). The record of the suppression hearing amply supports the suppression court’s conclusion that defendant’s statement was spontaneous and not the product of custodial interrogation.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. FennerNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. ArnetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. People v. CintronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API