Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 8, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his absence from a sidebar conference with a prospective juror requires reversal or a reconstruction hearing. The record establishes that the prospective juror was excused before trial commenced. Therefore, the absence of defendant from the sidebar conference did not have a "substantial effect on [defendant’s] ability to defend against the charges” (People v Sloan, 79 NY2d 386, 392; see, People v Thomas, 210 AD2d 935, lv denied 85 NY2d 943).

From our review of the record, we conclude that defendant’s conviction is not against the weight of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. FloresNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. HanlonNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API