People v. Martin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his absence from a sidebar conference with a prospective juror requires reversal or a reconstruction hearing. The record establishes that the prospective juror was excused before trial commenced. Therefore, the absence of defendant from the sidebar conference did not have a "substantial effect on [defendant’s] ability to defend against the charges” (People v Sloan, 79 NY2d 386, 392; see, People v Thomas, 210 AD2d 935, lv denied 85 NY2d 943).
From our review of the record, we conclude that defendant’s conviction is not against the weight of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. FloresNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. HanlonNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006