Legal Opinion
Nolin v. Town of Springville
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided March 22, 1999No. CV 98-BU-1561-SPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
BUTTRAM, District Judge.
This cause comes on to be heard on a motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants, the Town of Springville, Alabama (“Springville”), and Officer Christopher Isbell (“Isbell”), on February 12, 1999. In their motion, the defendants contend that the excessive force claims of the plaintiff, Nathan Nolin (“Nolin”), against Isbell are barred by the doctrine of qualified immunity and that the state law claims against Isbell are barred by state-law discretionary function immunity. The defendants further contend that Springville is not liable for any…
2Cases cited101 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nolin v. IsbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Bevill v. UAB Walker CollegeDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1999
- BYTHER EX REL. BYTHER v. City of MobileDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2005
- Glasscox v. Argo, City ofDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2020
- Gomez v. BellDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.