Legal Opinion

In re Hamilton

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 15, 1881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application of Nathaniel Horace Hamilton, for leave to change his name to Edmund Horace Hamilton. The application was made upon the applicant’s petition showing his residence, age and business, and his reasons for desiring the change of name, and also upon an affidavit of his attorney showing that no previous application had been made.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoesen, J.

It is our rule in these matters to require evidence, by affidavit or by verified petition, whether the applicant is married or single; whether he is now a party to any and what action or proceeding in the courts ; whether there are any judgments *80against Mm ; whether there is any outstanding bond or commercial paper, made, indorsed or accepted by Mm in the name, which he wishes to abandon ; of his age and birth-place, and the name of his parents.

Let this information be supplied, and then, if satisfactory, the order will be made.

An affidavit, showing the matters required by the opinion, was…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re EpsteinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1923
  2. In re BursteinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API