Legal Opinion
People v. Collier
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 27, 1994No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that his guilty plea to burglary in the second degree under superior court information No. 92-45 is deficient because he did not admit the specific crime he intended to commit when he knowingly entered the dwelling unlawfully. There is no requirement that the People allege or prove what particular crime was intended, or that the intended crime actually be committed (see, People v Mahboubian, 74 NY2d 174, 193; People v Mackey, 49 NY2d 274, 278-281; People v Boyd, 161 AD2d 1145, Iv denied 76 NY2d 785).
Additionally,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. MahboubianNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. MackeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. HermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. BoydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. DutcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. BibbesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- BIBBES, BRANDON, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. BibbesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. CollierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. CollierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.