People v. Mackey
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Meyer, J.
Presented by this appeal are questions concerning the right to a bill of particulars with respect to a charge of *277burglary and of whether Sandoval1 rulings by both the pretrial Judge and the Trial Judge improperly denied defendant the possibility of testifying in his own behalf. For the reasons set forth below, we conclude that neither the denial of the particulars motion nor the several Sandoval rulings constituted an abuse of discretion. The order of the Appellate Division should, therefore, be affirmed.
Defendant was indicted and charged with rape in the first…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. IannoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. DuffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. ShieldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. FitzgeraldNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by198 opinions
- People v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. MahboubianNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- People v. BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BennetteNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
193 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.