Agre v. Wolf
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Chief Circuit Judge *592I. Introduction
Plaintiffs seek a declaratory judgment that the Pennsylvania General Assembly exceeded its authority under the United States Constitution when it enacted a congressional redistricting plan that was intended to favor candidates from the Republican Party. Amended Complaint, ECF No. 88 at 1, 6, 11. Invoking 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Plaintiffs allege a direct violation of the "Elections Clause." Id. at 2. The Elections Clause, Article 1, Section 4, Clause 1 of the Constitution, provides state legislatures with authority to prescribe "[t]he Times, Places and…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment; Dissent.
2Cases cited102 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Corman v. TorresDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Common Cause v. RuchoDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2018
- League of Women Voters of PA v. CmwlthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018