Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Common Cause v. Rucho

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided August 27, 2018No. 1:16-CV-1026; No. 1:16-CV-1164Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

OSTEEN, JR., District Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part:

In Gill , prior to explaining the issue of standing as relevant to a claim of political gerrymandering, the Court summarized the gerrymandering line of cases. Gill v. Whitford , 585 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1916, 1926-29, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2018). The Court recognized, inter alia , that in Davis v. Bandemer "[a] majority of the Court agreed that the case before it was justiciable." Gill , 138 S.Ct. at 1927. The Court concluded its summary of these cases by stating:

Our considerable efforts in Gaffney, Bandemer , Vieth , and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API