Legal Opinion

The Ohioan

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided August 31, 1934No. Nos. 13858, 13944Published

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

The above-entitled suits were brought to recover damages alleged to have been caused by collision.

These suits were by stipulation tried together, and, as they arise out of the same happening, but one opinion will be required.

In the first above-entitled suit, the steam-tug Baldrock and Eastern Transportation Company were, on the petition of American Hawaiian Steamship Company, impleaded under the Fifty-Sixth rule of the Admiralty Rules (28 USCA § 723).

On evidence which at some points is conflicting, I find the facts as follows:

At the times hereinafter mentioned, T. J.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Lie v. San Francisco & Portland Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. The ManhattanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
  4. The Walter D. NoyesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1921
  5. Donnell v. DonnellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API