Legal Opinion

The Walter D. Noyes

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided October 25, 1921PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Admiralty. Cross-libels by R. 15. Drake, master of the steamship Barranca, against the steamship Walter D. Noyes, and by the Crowed & Thurlow ¡Steamship Company against the steamship Barranca.

1Opinion of the Court

GRONRR, District Judge.

Cross-libels were filed on behalf of the Barranca and the Noyes, growing out of a collision between them which occurred near the Thimble Shoal dredged channel in lower Chesapeake Bay on April 27, 1920. Both vessels were badly damaged. The Barranca, a freight and passenger vessel, 4,124 tons gross, 372 feet long, was at the time of the collision on a voyage from Liverpool to Jamaica, via Norfolk for bunkers. The Noyes, also a large vessel, 4,387 tons gross, 354 feet long, was on a voyage from Norfolk (Sewell’s Point) to Boston, loaded with coal. At 1:32 p. m. of April…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lie v. San Francisco & Portland Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Petition of Oskar Tiedemann and CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1959
  2. Baker-Whiteley Coal Co. v. Chesapeake S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
  3. In Re Tug Management CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Sheridan Towing Co. v. Steamship Harold H. JacquetDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. The OhioanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API