Pittman v. Dow Jones & Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
FELDMAN, District Judge.
The parties agree that this case may be resolved on the cross-motions for summary judgment which are presently before the Court. The facts have been stipulated, and the only issue is one of law: Whether, under Article 2315 of the Louisiana Civil Code, a newspaper of general circulation is liable to its readers for the unintentional publication of a fraudulent advertisement. The Court holds that a newspaper is not liable under the facts of this case for the unintentional publication of a fraudulent advertisement and, therefore, the defendant’s motion…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gutter v. Dow Jones, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Hanberry v. Hearst Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Langworthy v. Pulitzer Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Birmingham v. Fodor's Travel Publications, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
- Daniel v. Dow Jones & Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1987
- Eimann v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Braun v. Soldier of Fortune MagazineDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.