Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Dow Jones & Co., Inc.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided June 19, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-2885PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND REASONS

FELDMAN, District Judge.

The parties agree that this case may be resolved on the cross-motions for summary judgment which are presently before the Court. The facts have been stipulated, and the only issue is one of law: Whether, under Article 2315 of the Louisiana Civil Code, a newspaper of general circulation is liable to its readers for the unintentional publication of a fraudulent advertisement. The Court holds that a newspaper is not liable under the facts of this case for the unintentional publication of a fraudulent advertisement and, therefore, the defendant’s motion…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Gutter v. Dow Jones, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hanberry v. Hearst Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Langworthy v. Pulitzer Publishing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Birmingham v. Fodor's Travel Publications, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Braun v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Daniel v. Dow Jones & Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1987
  4. Eimann v. Soldier of Fortune Magazine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. Braun v. Soldier of Fortune MagazineDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API