Partello v. Holton
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Gratiot. (Hart, J.) Complainant, as guardian of an alleged incompetent person, filed a bill to compel the transfer to him of a mortgage executed to defendant for the use and benefit of the ward. Defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The complainant, claiming to have been duly appointed guardian by the probate court of Gratiot county over the person and effects of Henry G. Holton, an incompetent person, filed his bill in the Gratiot circuit court in chancery, averring as follows: That on November 8, 1884, Martin J. Holton was owing to said *374Henry G. Holton the sum of $324, to secure which sum.' he on that day executed a mortgage upon certain premises, jn Gratiot county, which said mortgage was executed to the defendant, Thomas Holton, for the use and benefit of the said Henry G. Holton, because at that time the said Henry,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- North v. JoslinMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- In re to Appoint a Guardian for StorickMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- In re to Appoint a Special Guardian for BassettMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- In re Estate of BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stevens v. StevensMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- In Re Johnson's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
- Jones v. LearnedColorado Court of Appeals · 1902
- Devereaux v. JanesMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- In re Chappell's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.