Sabo v. Delman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtPeck, P. J.
The question presented on this appeal is the sufficiency of the complaint. Although the three defendants occupy slightly different positions, they may, for the purpose of testing the complaint, be treated alike and referred to as the “ defendant ”.
Plaintiff is an employee of defendant in the business of manufacturing ladies shoes. He claims to have invented a machine of use and value in shoe manufacturing. The complaint sets forth two agreements between the parties by which they undertook the exploitation of plaintiff’s invention. The first agree*240ment, dated March 19, 1942, recites the…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Rosenwald v. GoldfeinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Brandwein v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Cohen v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956