Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cohen v. Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 22, 1956Published

1Dissent

Breitel, J. (dissenting).

I dissent and vote to reverse and deny the motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency.

Special Term held and the majority of this court is now holding by implication, albeit very much qualified, that one who fraudulently obtains a written agreement may obtain immunity for his fraud by including in such agreement a clause denying that any representation was made with respect to the matter alleged to constitute the fraud. This is decided on the pleading alone, the allegations of which we are bound to take as true.

That has never been the law in this State, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Bridger v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Angerosa v. White Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  4. Angerosa v. White CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  5. Soviero Bros. Contracting Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API