Legal Opinion

Taggart ex rel. Seitz v. Board of Auditors

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1888PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Bill to restrain the board of auditors of Wayne county from purchasing a lot for county purposes. Defendants appeal. The facts .are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The bill in this case is an ex officio information to restrain the board of county auditors of Wayne county from buying a lot for county buildings, of the value of more than $100,000. The bill contains charges of fraud and collusion. In the Wayne circuit-court, where the cause was heard, a final injunction was. granted as prayed. Defendants appeal.

A preliminary objection was made that the relators have no standing in court, and that the suit is not in proper form. If the bill was filed to obtain relief for *55them the objection would have force. But there has never been any rule in equity…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Attorney General ex rel. McRae v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hartingh v. Bay Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Board of Auditors v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Clegg v. Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Attorney General v. MurrayMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API