Flowers v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We have reviewed the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and we affirm Jerry Flowers’ convictions and sentences. Because they were not orally pronounced at sentencing, however, we strike the special conditions of probation found in conditions three, five, eight, eighteen, and twenty. See, e.g., Hamilton v. State, 653 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). In addition, we strike the $288 in court costs and the $100 lab fee for the Florida Department of Law Enforcement because they were imposed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Reyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Sutton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Nank v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Hamilton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
3Cited by1 opinion
- Madison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995