Legal Opinion

Flowers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 16, 1995No. 94-02634PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We have reviewed the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and we affirm Jerry Flowers’ convictions and sentences. Because they were not orally pronounced at sentencing, however, we strike the special conditions of probation found in conditions three, five, eight, eighteen, and twenty. See, e.g., Hamilton v. State, 653 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Nank v. State, 646 So.2d 762 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). In addition, we strike the $288 in court costs and the $100 lab fee for the Florida Department of Law Enforcement because they were imposed…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Reyes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Sutton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Nank v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  5. Hamilton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Madison v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API