Legal Opinion

The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner–Appellee, In the Interest of S.N–V., a Child, and Concerning B.A.N., Respondent–Appellant.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 2011No. 10CA2303Published

1Opinion of the Court

300 P.3d 911

The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner–Appellee,

In the Interest of S.N–V., a Child,

and

Concerning B.A.N., Respondent–Appellant.

No. 10CA2303.

Colorado Court of Appeals,

Div. III.

Dec. 22, 2011.

[300 P.3d 912]

Douglas J. Friednash, City Attorney, Laura Grzetic Eibsen, Assistant City Attorney, Denver, Colorado, for Petitioner–Appellee.

Terry Ross, Guardian Ad Litem.

Susan P. Halloran, Littleton, Colorado, for Respondent–Appellant.

Opinion by Judge FURMAN.

B.A.N. (father) appeals the judgment terminating the parental relationship with his daughter, S.N–V. We affirm.

I. Introduction

Father…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. CalverleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API