Legal Opinion

Farmers' & Mechanics' Nat. Bank of Fort Worth v. Head

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1928No. 875-4355PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

The writ of error herein presents the question of whether or not defendant in error Head has been discharged as in-dorser upon a promissory note of $5,000, payable to the plaintiff in error, which in turn depends upon whether or not the failure of the bank to give the indorser notice of the dishonor and nonpayment of the note by the maker has been waived. The trial court instructed a verdict for the defendant Head,- and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed that judgment (268 S. W. 992).

The plaintiff in error presents the matter to us, as it did in the Court of Civil Appeals, upon these…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Curtiss v. MartinIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Doherty v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Linthicum v. BagbyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  4. Thompson v. CurryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Lane v. StewardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Langley v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Anderson v. LaddTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Roberts v. GriffithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  4. Fortner v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Boggs v. Farmers' Fund of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API