Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Beverwyk

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 10, 2017No. Docket No. 333301PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

Petitioners, Joe Patterson and Woodward, Inc., appeal as of right the trial court's order terminating their personal protection order (PPO) against respondent, Michael Lee Beverwyk, following an evidentiary hearing on respondent's motion to terminate the PPO. The PPO had been issued following an ex parte hearing under MCL 600.2950a, which, upon petition by "an individual," authorizes entry of a PPO to restrain or enjoin another individual from engaging in conduct prohibited in the Michigan Penal Code under MCL 750.411h (stalking), MCL 750.411i (aggravated stalking), or MCL 750.411s (online…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Whitman v. City of BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Smith v. Foerster-Bolser Construction, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Barclae v. ZarbMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Marshall Lasser, PC v. GeorgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Lamkin v. EngramMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jacqueline Nowicki-Hockey v. Bank of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Sathya Gowda v. Mune GowdaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API