Legal Opinion
Lamkin v. Engram
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 15, 2012No. Docket No. 303008PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtK. F. Kelly, J.
Fetitioner, Mary Ann Lamkin, appeals as of right an order denying her petition for a personal protection order (FEO) against respondent, Daniel Engram. We conclude that the circuit court committed reversible error when it dismissed Lamkin’s petition without first interviewing Lamkin or conducting a hearing as required by MCR 3.705. We therefore vacate the circuit court’s dismissal and remand for further proceedings.
I. BASIC FACTS
Lamkin and Engram are neighbors with an obviously contentious relationship. Engram’s family and visitors *703make frequent use of an easement through Lamkin’s property.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kloian v. Domino's Pizza, LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Sherman v. Sea Ray Boats, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Henry v. Dow Chemical Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
- Wilcoxon v. Wayne County Neighborhood Legal ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Kampf v. KampfMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Badeen v. PAR, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Patterson v. BeverwykMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- City of Detroit v. Robert James Golf Management LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
- Estate of Kinzie Renee Carlsen v. Southwestern Mi Emergency ServsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
- John Thomas Benson v. Mary Pat FosterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.