Sabel v. Planters National Bank
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 39 — Action by M. Sabel & Son Against B. D. Chalkley & Co. to Subject by Attachment a Lot of Hides in Payment of a Debt of Plaintiffs Against Defendants — APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT, CHANCERY DIVISION. Judgment Sustaining Claim of Planters Nat. Bank of Richmond, Va., to Attached Property, and Plaintiff Appeals. POINTS MADE AND AUTHORITIES.
Read the full summary
Case 39 — Action by M. Sabel & Son Against B. D. Chalkley & Co. to Subject by Attachment a Lot of Hides in Payment of a Debt of Plaintiffs Against Defendants — APPEAL FROM JEFFERSON CIRCUIT COURT, CHANCERY DIVISION. Judgment Sustaining Claim of Planters Nat. Bank of Richmond, Va., to Attached Property, and Plaintiff Appeals. POINTS MADE AND AUTHORITIES. CITED. 1. M. Sabel & Sons, having a claim against B. D. Chalkley & Co., ,of Richmond, Ya., instituted this action thereon against him in the Jefferson Circuit Court. • The attachment issuing therein was executed inter alia on ten bales of dry…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the cotjbt by
JUDGE HOBSON'
Affirming.
B. D. Chalkley & Co., who are merchants at Richmond, Va., received an order from L. Marx & Bro., merchants at Louisville, Ky., for ten bales of dry hides. Chalkley & Co. shipped tbe hides to Louisville, and took a bill of lading consigning the bides to their own order. They then dre-w a draft on Marx & Bro. for $l,735.6lf), the amount for which the hides were sold, and sol'd the draft to the appellee, the Planters’ National Bank of Virginia, with the bill of lading attached. At the foot of the bill of lading was this indorsement.; “L. Marx & Bro.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Scharff v. MeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Neill & Ellingham v. Rogers Bros. Produce Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
- Douglas v. People's BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
- Petitt & Co. v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
- Newman v. MantleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hawkins v. Alfalfa Products Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Choteau Trust & Banking Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909