Legal Opinion

State v. Kurtz

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1954No. 1060PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Defendants, Walter Kurtz and William Gorman, were jointly charged by an information filed in the superior court with obstructing a public officer, a felony. There was a trial before a jury, which resulted in separate verdicts of guilty, and from the judgment rendered thereon they have duly prosecuted a joint appeal to this court. The sentences imposed were one and one-half to three years in the state penitentiary at Florence, Arizona.

The sole assignment of error is that the trial court was mistaken, as a matter of law, in not granting their motion for a directed verdict at the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Platt v. GreenwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Neallus v. Hutchinson Amusement Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1927
  3. Tomaris v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Russell v. GlascowArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Stapleton v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. White v. Revco Discount Drug Centers, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. FontesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. State v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Duncan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API