Legal Opinion

Stapleton v. Frohmiller

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1938No. Civil No. 4048PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

F. H. Stapleton, hereinafter called petitioner, brought this original proceeding for a writ of mandamus against Ana Frohmiller, state auditor of the state of Arizona, hereinafter called respondent, asking that she be compelled to issue to petitioner certain salary warrants. The facts of the case are in nowise in dispute and may be stated as follows:

The legislature of Arizona, at its first special session in 1936, adopted chapter 13, commonly known as the “Unemployment Compensation Act of 1936,” the material portions of which read as follows:

“Sec. 10. Unemployment Compensation Commission. (a)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Winsor v. HuntArizona Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. KurtzArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Klahr v. WinterbleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Donaldson v. SiskArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Tomaris v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Industrial Commission v. Arizona State Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API