Legal Opinion

State v. Bolin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 30, 1998No. 78,078, 78,257, 78,258PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Six, J.:

These two consolidated cases require interpretation of the Kansas Sentencing Guidelines Act (KSGA), K.S.A. 21-4701 et seq.

Michael Bolin and Michael Woodward seek review of the Court of Appeals decisions affirming their sentences. Both cases concern the definition of a “multiple conviction case” under K.S.A. 21-4720(b). We granted both defendants’ petitions for review to reconcile conflicting definitions of the term “multiple conviction case” under K.S.A. 21-4720(b). The conflict arises from two Court of Appeals decisions: State v. Bolin, 24…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. DonlaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  2. State v. RoderickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. State v. Vega-FuentesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. State v. RileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Unrau v. Kidron Bethel Retirement Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  2. State v. QuestedSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. Petty v. City of El DoradoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  4. State v. McCurrySupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  5. State v. HookerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API