Legal Opinion

State, Department of Human Resources v. Lovell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 12, 1994No. 146825; CA A81354Published

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Father appeals from an order denying his motion to vacate an ex parte order obtained by the Department of Human Resources (DHR) to withhold workers’ compensation benefits. We dismiss the appeal.

Father was injured at work and entered into a settlement of that claim with the insurer. The terms of the agreement provided that father would release his right to temporary and permanent disability, vocational rehabilitation and survivor’s benefits in exchange for a lump sum payment. DHR filed a motion ex parte, seeking an order directing the insurer to withhold 25 percent of the settlement, because…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Columbia Auto Works, Inc. v. YatesOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Fehrenbacher v. FehrenbacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API